Friday 15 january 2010 5 15 /01 /Jan /2010 05:07

So now that you’ve got hold of your Google Nexus One superphone and had time to play around with the new Android packing smartphone, how are you finding the handset’s battery, is it good or bad, experiencing short life or reasonable battery life?

As with most smartphones the battery life will only last depending on how you use the smartphone, if you heavily use such things as GPs, Bluetooth, watch loads of videos and listen to music most of the time, the battery life is going to drain quickly.

Google has given some basic standard IBM ThinkPad R50 batteryIBM ThinkPad R51 batteryIBM ThinkPad R52 battery, IBM ThinkPad T40 batteryIBM ThinkPad T41 batteryIBM ThinkPad T42 batteryadvice on how to optimise the Nexus One battery life which we posted on earlier and can be read  but basically it’s all common sense stuff.

So we are asking our Nexus One toting readers how they are fairing with the battery life, does it last you a day or do you need to charge before the day is out. Do you think the  battery is poor or reasonable considering the smartphone. If you have a gripe about the Nexus One battery life or want to praise it, then feel free to drop us a comment below.

By batteryyear
Enter comment - View the 4 comments
Wednesday 13 january 2010 3 13 /01 /Jan /2010 07:42

United States Advanced Battery Consortium, LLC (USABC), an organization whose members are Chrysler Group LLC, Ford Motor Company and General Motors Company, seeking requests for proposal information (RFPIs) for four projects related to advanced battery development for hybrid electric engines, plug-in hybrid electric and electric cars.

USABC four RFPIs, for the treatment of contracts that will provide 50 percent minimum cost share of the developers, is to 1) develop advanced high-performance batteries for electric vehicle (EV) applications, 2) development of advanced systems for energy storage for high-powerVGP-BPS8, VGP-BPS8A, ,VGP-BPS8B, , VGP-BPS9,, VGP-BPS9/B, VGP-BPS9/S lower energy-energy storage system (LEESS) for power-assist hybrid electric vehicles (PAHEV) applications, 3) development of advanced high-performance batteries for plug-in hybrid electric vehicle (PHEV) applications, and 4) a technical evaluation of the proposed advanced battery technology for EV applications.

The RFPIs for advanced battery development aimed at developers with electrochemical energy storage products that meet or are close to USABC long-term criteria for electric vehicle applications .

The RFPI for the development of advanced high-performance batteries for EV application concerns a proposal information to re-engage development of high energy-to-power ratio of batteries, especially those that use a carbon-based material (graphic or otherwise) as negative electrode active material.

The RFPI for Development of Advanced Energy Storage Systems for High-Power, LEESS for PAHEV Applications designed proposal information to develop advanced systems for storing energy for PAHEV applications. The goal is to design, develop, manufacture, test and deliver advanced storage systems that meet USABC goals. The main technological challenges to be overcome to improve the Automotive market penetration of systems for energy storage, are questions that power density, self-discharge rate and the desire to leave the system during storage and still meet the life expectancy, the complex system and targets in a cost-effective.

The RFPI for the development of advanced high-performance batteries for PHEV application relates to a proposal of information to continue and expand development of existing programs USABC battery development, focusing on low-cost, long life, high energy and high power technology.

Finally, the Technology Assessment - EV Applications RFPI proposal seeks information to develop state of the proposed technique provides treatment for a USABC Development Program and will have to answer developers are able to produce 36 cells or modules for testing.

The deadline for all RFPIs is Friday, January 29th, 2010.

For complete and detailed information about each RFPIs, visit USABC pages in the United States Council for usabc. In addition, developers can contact Eric Heim,

USABC is a consortium of USCAR. Made possible through a partnership with the U.S. Department of Energy, USABC's mission is to develop techniques forVGP-BPS9A, VGP-BPS9A/B, vgp-bps13 , vgp-bps13/s , vgp-bps13a/b vgp-bps13b/b electrochemical energy storage to support commercialization of fuel cells, hybrid and electric cars.

The U.S. DOE's overarching mission is to promote the national, economic and energy security of the United States. DOE's Vehicle Technologies Program Office is working with industry to develop advanced transportation technologies that reduce its use of imported oil and increase our energy security. Electrochemical energy storage has been identified as a critical tool for advanced, fuel efficient, light and heavy vehicles.

About USCAR

Founded in 1992, USCAR the collaborative automotive technology organization of Chrysler LLC, Ford Motor Company and General Motors Company. The goal of USCAR is to further strengthen the technology base for the domestic automotive industry through research and development cooperation. For more information, visit USCAR website

 

 

 

 

 

By batteryyear
Enter comment - View the 4 comments
Tuesday 12 january 2010 2 12 /01 /Jan /2010 05:29

Late last week, Lawson Software announced it would pay $160 million to buy Healthvision Solutions, a healthcare software maker owned by parent Quovadx Holdings and backed by venture-capital firm Battery Ventures. While the companies aren’t well known and the sums involved aren’t huge, the deal exemplifies how some venture capitalists are profiting by deviating from investing in young companies and instead doing buyout-type deals with more mature companies.

In this case, venture firm Battery has been making a push into more later-stage buyout-type deals for the past several years. At first glance, however, its return from pursuing this strategy with Healthvision doesn’t look so stellar. Battery originally took then publicly-traded IBM ThinkPad T41 batteryIBM ThinkPad T42 batteryIBM ThinkPad T43 batteryQuovadx (later rebranded as Healthvision) private in 2007 for $136.7 million. Against that number, a $160 million sale yields barely any profit at all.


But Battery partner Dave Tabors says there’s more to the deal than that. He says Battery garnered about a 3.5 times return on its investment in Quovadx/Healthvision in less than three years.


How? It turns out that of the $136.7 million that was put into taking Quovadx private in 2007, Battery only put in $25 million in debt and $18 million of its cash at the time to take the portion that became Healthvision private. The rest of the $136.7 million came from a mixture of debt, equity and cash on Quovadx’s balance sheet, but was mostly put towards another piece of Quovadx’s business that was spun off into a separate company dubbed Rogue Wave Software, says Mr. Tabors.


Quovadx/Healthvision later acquired two companies, but the amount of cash Battery had to put into those deals was also minimal. That’s because the two acquisitions were funded by $60 million in debt and just $5 million of Battery’s cash, says Mr. Tabors.


In the meantime, he says, Healthvision generated $15 million of cash from its operations, which was used to pay down the company’s debt load. So by the time the sale to Lawson rolled around, Healthvision owed a total of $70 million in debt and had raised $23 million in equity from Battery.


All of this means that when Lawson agreed to pay $160 million to buy Healthvision, $70 million of that total purchase price was used to repay the IBM ThinkPad R50 batteryIBM ThinkPad R51 batteryIBM ThinkPad R52 batteryIBM ThinkPad T40 batterydebt the company owed. Another $10 million was used to pay deal fees and the stake owned by Healthvision’s management, says Mr. Tabors. That left Battery with a $80 million return off its $23 million equity investment, or about 3.5 times its cash outlay.


Mr. Tabors says that while there are “tremendous” early-stage venture investments out there, this kind of deal puts to use different skills since it involves looking at more mature parts of tech and using debt rather than just equity.


“Over the last 10 years, we’ve built a toolkit around later growth and buyout transactions,” he says. “Now we’ve built that practice up to the point that it’s a good chunk–though still a minority–of our fund.”

By batteryyear
Enter comment - View the 4 comments
Monday 11 january 2010 1 11 /01 /Jan /2010 06:48

This automated message is the first article of your blog. It will help you get started with Overblog. You can edit or delete it by going to the "Publish" section of your administration page.

Hope you'll enjoy blogging with us!

The Overblog team

PS: In order to log in to your administration panel go to Overblog portal.

By batteryyear
Enter comment - View the 4 comments

Overview

Create a blog

Calendar

February 2012
M T W T F S S
    1 2 3 4 5
6 7 8 9 10 11 12
13 14 15 16 17 18 19
20 21 22 23 24 25 26
27 28 29        
<< < > >>
Create your blog for free on over-blog.com - Contact - Terms of Service - Earn Royalties - Report abuse